Suri Cruise Conspiracy Rumor of the Day

I disagree, it's well known and documented that Suri was born on the same day and floor as Brook Shield's baby. I forget where, but that's easy enough to determine. While intriguing, this theory holds no water.

Suri looks like my Uncle Lou, maybe he is the father. Good lord, everyone leave this couple alone. They gave us pictures and we still aren't happy. Newborns look like everyone in the beginning.

Totally agreed. That's why at 6 months she looked 9, and at 9 months the "bump" was as square as a carboard box. It's also why the supposedly 3 month old baby in the photo looks 6 months: that baby is HUGE, has far too much hair, and much too vibrant an expression to only be 3 months old!

Now the question is how much we should blame Annie Liebowitz for going along with this farce: you'd think she at least would have some standards.

Well known and documented my ass. NOBODY has made any sort of testimony about this, except by "anonymous sources." No docs, no nurses, not even Brooke herself. Nobody saw or heard her give birth. The only documentation is that fudged-up birth cert, which was not actually signed by a witness.

And by the way, pictures are not PROOF that all is well in the Gay Midget land. It is EVIDENCE. Tampered proof is not proof. We see pictures of A baby. There is no reason to suppose it is biologically related to Cruise when it resembles someone else, nor is there any reason to think she's normal or healthy.

I too am surprised at Annie Leibowitz...I thought she had more scruples than that. Still, you throw enough money at anyone, and they'll usually give in at some point. There is NO WAY anyone can check the hospital records, since the new HIPPA rules forbid it. An experienced hacker is needed for such data-gathering. My theory is, Katie gave birth sometime in late December, probably at a Scientology compound, where secrecy is guaranteed. Eventually, the truth is going to come out.

If Katie has any brains left, she'll get a sample of Mr. Cruise's DNA and store it away for the day she finally leaves him. If the baby can be proven NOT his, he'll stand less of a chance of keeping her, and eventually turning her into a cult freak.

P.S. I hate to say this, but poor little Suri is a pretty homely baby. Take a look at Rachel Weisz's new baby for comparison.

Megan, I bet Cruiser made her sign a gag order.

mandy, too bad everyone can see she's not a newborn -- she's at least eight months. Babies have recognizable features by then, LIKE CHRIS KLEIN'S ALMOND EYES.

And I thought I'd mention that all these gossip blogs have been being spammed by mysterious people who insist that Suri is a pretty baby, that she looks just like Tom and Katie both, and the rest of the silly script. Some of them chastise other people for daring not to believe the farce.

Poll rigging. Ticket scams. Now blog spamming.... the Scientologists are busy.

ffordegroupie, have you checked out Perez? They ALL went there. There's about 500 comments, and they all say the exact same thing: "she's a georgous baby and there's something wrong with you for thinking otherwise!" It's really creepy how they were all given the same script, though I guess it's slightly less obvious than the script a few months ago which was "with so many horrible things in the world, how can you waste time caring about poor Tom and Katie? Leave them alone!" I dunno, I could ask the same thing of cult members who spend all their time spamming celebrity gossip message boards...

Oh for the love of God people, let it go. #2 is right- we've now seen Suri, and much to all of our dismay, she is a gorgeous baby who looks JUST like BOTH of her parents. And still those stupid assholes have to try to make some crazy shit up about it all being a conspiracy.

Believe me, I wanted to see a baby cyclops with lobster claws as much as the next person, but unfortunately, as evidenced by the leaked excerpts of the Vanity Fair article, it appears that they are more normal than we had ever imagined in our worst nightmares.

And #7 you need to lay off the crack, you are one of the millions of idiots who add fuel the this fire.

Honestly, mw: now that we've already aired the script, couldn't you have thought of something more original to say? Or at least not used the key word "georgous"?

Here are some suggestions:
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/thesaurus?book=Thesaurus&va=beautiful

I think she has her mom's eyes. I think she's a beautiful baby. I think she's probably a cute baby in person too. BUT I think she's could be chris kline's. As much as I mock a conspiracy theory....this one makes way too much sense.

I just remember how toward the end of the pregnancy we all kept saying...it's she EVER GOING to have that baby? And how there were so many shots, one day she's bigger than the next....

I would do ANYTHING for chris to turn all chivalrous and demand a paternity test. if he comes out anytime in the next 10 years saying he's converted to scientology....I'll be TOTALLY conviced suri is his.

Sorry, but she does not look like a 4-month old baby...more like a, oh, I dunno, 6 month old. There is no way this baby is TC's and there is no way it was born April 18. NO WAY.
I find it quite interesting how vicious the anti-conspiracy theorists are.

Babybing - yes, the viciousness is weird. I swear part of the script is "include 1 swear word" because, at least on Perez and in mw's too, there is always a "fucking" or an "asshole" along with the word "georgous" and a "leave them alone."

If they want to be left alone, why did he jump on the stupid couch? Why did she go out every day in the last trimester with a square baby bump that got smaller and larger? Why did they plaster the poor kid's face on the cover of Vanity Fair instead of just releasing some cute family photo a week after her birth? The whole "leave them alone! you're so MEEEEN" script rings particularly hollow considering their behaviour.

Here's my favorite "totally fake looking" Katie pregnant photo. I'm 35 weeks pregnant, start out way heavier than Katie, and even I don't look like this!

http://www.lermanet.com/reference/katie-holmes-pregnant.jpg

Here's my favorite "totally fake looking" Katie pregnant photo. I'm 35 weeks pregnant with my 3rd kiddo, started out way heavier than Katie, and even I don't look like this!

http://www.lermanet.com/reference/katie-holmes-pregnant.jpg

kelly that IS the best pictures. You'd think with all their connections in hollywood, they could have got someone to help Katie with her fake belly every morning.

If she was pregnant in March 05 when she and Chris broke up, then why wasn't she showing at all in June and July when she and Tom were parading around Europe? She would have been approx 4-5 months along....just a thought.

Eye, I was 26 years old when I had my first pregnancy, WITH TWINS, and I did not even begin to show until I was nearly 6 months (I am 5'8"). Katie is young, it was her first pregnancy, she is tall... there is no reason why she *would* show at 4-5 months!

Also, let's say she got pregnant on March 1 by Chris, she would only be 4 months along on July 1 while they were parading around Europe. At that point, she wouldn't really be showing....

thank you for doing the math LT.

If she conceived in march, she'd be having the baby in january.

are there lots of pictures of her out, about and shopping in early to mid/late january?

some one cut me off. I sound like one of hte people that believe in area 54.

Bflogurl: I was just posing an idea. I too was 27 when I got pregnant with my first child and I am 5'8" also. I started showing at 4 months. Everyone is different. I just don't understand why people cannot believe that this just might be their child. I know TC is a nutjob and all but would it be totally unreasonable to think that she might really love him and they might really be happy with their baby? Suri does look like both of them. Everyone says she has Chris' droopy eyes but Katie has droopy, almond shaped eyes also, maybe she just has her mothers eyes. Tom's eyes aren't exactly round either.

My husband commented yesterday that Tom seems just arrogant enough that he'd insist on having at least one biological child, and that Suri could easily have been produced via the turkey baster method (which lesbian friends of ours used successfully a few years back). However, a lot of the late pregnancy photos of Katie do look extremely fake. The main thing that struck me was that her arms and legs appeared to get thinner with more visible veins in March and April, while most women swell during the last two months of pregnancy, to the point where wedding rings and favorite shoes don't fit.

Suri is just too cute! Love that pic of her. Tom is probably eager to introduce Suri to Scientology. Her first word might just be Xenu!

My boss has two sets of twins and says that there is no way Suri was 3 - 3.5 months when the Vanity Fair photos were taken. She is older than that and Tomkat is trying to pull a fast one on the public. I concede that Suri may be/probably is Tom's child but with all the weird stuff surrounding this couple would anyone really be surprised if he turned out NOT to be the biological father?

This is by far the cleanest theory to surface - why fake the pregnancy length for any other reason, why hide her, why the fierce denials when anyone would just laugh at the craziness otherwise? ALSO - why the extreme baby photoshopping? I can understand wanting to photograph a baby at an older time when they have more expressions and have more features, but to not even leave the compound EVER prior to their staged photo release? or since? strange.

I remember clicking back through a fashion site while Katie was pregnant, and landing on a fashion 'dont' which pictured Katie in that satin dress and the editor pointing out that satin was a no-no because it showed everything and even a skinny woman like Katie would show a bump that would spark rumors... she WAS showing... one example: http://www.eonline.com/Gossip/Fashion/Archive2/0,1912,1370,00.html

People fudge this stuff all the time, how many 8 pound premies are born 7 mo after the wedding? It is just in this case that it is a little more strange shadowed in fame and Scientology...

I have to say, I had to go back and check past pictures of both my daughters when they were Suri's age. Both looked older than 3 1/2 months because they were heavy and long (95th percentile), had good head and neck control for their age, and quite alert. I got surprised comments all the time from people who just couldn't believe it when I told them how old they were. Plus, my younger daughter had a head *full* of dark hair at 3 1/2 months. Still does!

So, even though I won't completely rule out anything fishy, I'm leaning more toward thinking she was born roughly when they claim she was born. However, not sure on whether TC's the daddy.

Another thing before bed: when did they announce it again? It was VERY early on, wasn't it? Everyone with an ounce of sense (and, yes, I know who we're talking about here) knows that you don't announce pregnancies until at least the end of the first trimester. Trust me, as someone who's had multiple miscarraiges, it's just too painful to have to go back and say "nevermind" and it's SO common that people just don't do it. Weren't they talking about it almost immediately? Who does that?

I've been thinking the same thing since last night. Not the Chris Klein part but, the baby is much older part.
Remember when we didn't see Katie for a while. When the press noticed, she and Tom did a quick photo op in some other country. Then suddenly, there's Katie again with a weird looking stomach shopping for shoes every day. Not baby things, not fondling baby clothes. Shoes. Ive been pregnant a few times and did not look at a single pair of shoes while I was 9 months pregnant. I took the Brittney route and wore flip flops. I couldn't imagine wearing regular shoes at that point. Once the baby was born, and my feet slimmed down again...nother story. Then the strange birth cert. Its all adding up. I dont know if shes Toms, I don't think she looks Asian. I do think she is Katie's and that she was born at least a month before her "birth day" It might be something as simple as being embarrassed that she got pregnant so soon after meeting, or wanting the birth to coincide with his movie. I do think there is something strange going on. And that is one adorable baby!

mw, the only ones on crack are the freakoid fans who think that a series of staged, photoshopped photographs will actually convince anyone. Like, oh, you and 2 for example? Or are you stupid enough to believe that fate synced up the "birth" of Suri and the MI:III premiere? Wait, don't answer that -- I know the answer. You are. (Especially since you aren't bright enough to answer a single point I made)

Megan, yeah I've seen that. Also seen them on dlisted and idontlikeyouinthatway -- it's creepy how they all say the exact same thing. It's like the script all those people had about talking about Suri -- they all say the same thing, over and over.

A few of them are more creative, and whine that they've given "proof," so we should believe everything the Cruiser says.

Jogirl, yeah she swelled up all over about three months before the "birth," vanished for about a week, then reappeared with her arms and legs all skinny, and a giant fake-looking belly. Shopping for SHOES, which no term woman would do mere days before giving birth.

And LT, thanks for the math. It all sort of fits.

I'm not sure why snotty morons think it's so freakish to think Tom would orchestrate this sort of thing. Gay men have before, you know -- he's just being bipolar about it. What's more, Hollywood people have as well -- adopted kids they tried to pass off as theirs, or give birth to kids they "adopted."

It's probably just a fun theory, but her eyes do look an awful lot like Chris Klein's, don't they?

I think Suri is a really pretty baby (#6- I really don't know how you can call her homely but I'm not sure if she really is Tom's. I agree that she looks a lot older than 3 or 4 months and damn it, she looks mixed! My niece is Asian/Caucasian and there's a pic of Suri where they looks almost exactly alike.

You know how they say birds, honeybees and some animals run away before an earthquake? Well, that's how Paramount dropped Tommy's ass right before the Suri publicity scam. Ran off
before the disaster. And it is an unmitigated
disaster. For all the time, effort and expense, the whole thing raised more questions about
Tom's sexuality and sperm count than it put to rest.

Oh come on! We really dont want to believe that. How credible is this information? Poor baby getting negative publicity already. I don't like both tom especially katie. But at least give them the benefit of the doubt.

Do any of ya'll have babies? Seriously now, I know TC is CRAZY, and I too have made fun of the whole "Suri existing" thing, but come on? Some of ya'll are just ignorant. A new born baby CAN HAVE A FULL HEAD OF HAIR!! A 3 and 1/2 month old baby can look bigger than average!! I have a 3 year old niece who looks like a 6 year old!! Does that really mean she's 6?! Jesus!! How dumb can some of ya'll REALLY be?!?! Now, whether or not it's Chris Klein's, who knows?! It'd be a great scandal!! But, I think she looks like a good mix of Tom & Katie, so whatever.

This is absolutely incredible !!! Are our lives so depraved and shallow ... empty to the core that we look for outside stimulation to the point of destroying others' reputation and well-being? I have never seen such garbage spewed by so many... People...please get a life!!! your own!! We are indulging in a destructive past-time in this country based on absolute negativity and superficial obsession. It is certainly a sad time indeed in our evolution as human beings....

I honestly do not believe the baby is Tom's. I do believe that she is an adorable baby though and do not understand how anybody could think otherwise. 1st. Why did they have to do so much photoshopping for these pics.
2nd. Excuses for not getting a pic sooner sound false.
3rd. Poor Katie sounds even more scripted in the article than she does in person.
4th. Anybody ever thought that Paramount dropped him when they did b/c they knew the pictures were coming and they knew something that we dont? Maybe they got out before it went any further than it did.
5th. You do remember in the article that "Katie reads these sites". Maybe some of the comments have come from her. Not to say this site in particular but maybe she has posted comments. Doubtful but possibility if she reads all of this.
The truth will come out and you cant hide a lie for forever. It would be a horrible shame if all this was a lie and they went this big with it. Exactly how is that a healthy lifestyle. And Prozac is bad...yeah...okay. I've observed all the going ons from the beginning until now. Nothing seems real and Katie does not seem like the girl in interviews a few months priot to meeting Tom. Whatever happened to her not having sex before getting married and BAM in a matter of weeks she did with him? From beginning to end nobody can look at this whole situation and say it all seems 100% to them.

I don't think the baby is Tom's, not even via turkey baster, and I think Suri was born before April 18, not only because of the strange way her birth certificate was submitted - but who'd be able (or willing) to go shopping for shoes a few days before giving birth? Shopping for other things I'd have believed...

... and to make the process of determining the baby's age even more difficult, they waited for weeks until actually publishing the pics taken in mid-July.

Scam!

I don't think the baby is Tom's, not even via turkey baster, and I think Suri was born before April 18, not only because of the strange way her birth certificate was submitted - but who'd be able (or willing) to go shopping for shoes a few days before giving birth? Shopping for other things I'd have believed...

... and to make the process of determining the baby's age even more difficult, they waited for weeks until actually publishing the pics taken in mid-July.

Scam!

What is the benefit of a successful conspiracy? Is it b/c he's gay, it's not his kid, some scientology crap? Who really cares, I mean seriously? I understand the benefit of some conspiracies but not this one.

"but who'd be able (or willing) to go shopping for shoes a few days before giving birth?"

You've obviously never been pregnant!! Walking helps a woman to dilate faster. I shopped the DAY BEFORE I gave birth to my second daughter. WOW!! People, why don't you educate yourselves before speaking? If you don't know anything about babies/pregnancies, then shut-up. You sound soooo dumb with your lame conspiracy theories.

ha ha, I KNEW it!

More food for thought: wasn't it established that Tom couldn't have kids of his own? I could be wrong on that one...

PS: Nerak, keep in mind that you only know about our so-called "obsessions" because you visited this site yourself. It's entertainment for Christ's sake. This site was created so that people could take pleasure in the superficial and post personal comments about people they will never know or meet. Reading this stuff and posting comments is no more harmful than watching a movie or soap opera, so who cares???

Tomkat were here in Sydney on February 17th for Kerry Packer's funeral- if i was near my due date there is no way i would be on a 14 hour flight suspended above the Pacific. Either she had it before that date, and it was klein's, or it was tom's and she had it 2 months later... dunno. Based on the pics it looks as if she's still legitimately preggers. http://www.katieholmespictures.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=1029

nice conclusions but that holds nothing

only monkeys bear children as hairy as suri at just 3 months!

This is ridiculous. The writer tries to say that Suri has Chris' slanted eyes, but Katie's eyes have a slant to them as well.

Those photos of Suri at allegedly 6 months had her walking and holding a shopping bag.

Most pediatricians will tell you that many babies will start walking at about fourteen months.

Unless that ridiculous Barley mix that Scientology harps on feeding newborns gave her some kind of accelerated learning ability, I call malarkey on the whole thing.

Many of you bored housewife types need to quit focusing on the eyes or this "poor"' couple. They are insane individuals which in one way or another have contributed to a cult which itself has been responsible for loss of life and human rights abuses. It is a scourge on society.