"Are you kidding me?" the techno rocker blogged. "Putting your [bleeping] CHILD on the cover of Vanity Fair? Are they out of their minds? Using a child as a p.r. prop?? Argh."
"In the grand scheme of things fame pales in comparison to family and child-rearing. I don't know Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, but I really cannot for a second fathom the mindset of parents who would sell pictures of their children and use their children to get better press coverage.
"I'm sorry, I try not to be too judgmental, but it's gross."
Many more photos of TomKat, minus Suri, enjoying a soccer game are after the jump.
(Source)
ChristopherM
I'm far more concerned with the sort of mindset it takes to get someone else's child, give her a hairweave, claim her as your own, and put her on the cover of a magazine in order to get better press coverage. Ponder that one for a moment, Mr. Moby!
SmilesD
I don't understand his shock. He is talking about Tom Cruise right. Dude is insane.
skinny_fat
So it was OK to publish/sell pics of Shiloh Jolie-Pitt because the money went to charity, Mr. Moby man? BTW, NOBODY paid Tom Cruise for the pics. They did it for free. God, only Moby could make me defend Tom Cruise. Now I have another reason to hate him.
BB
What the heck does Mr. Techno-has-been know about this?
they did not sell any photos..
the shoot was free.
The people who sold theor baby's photos 'moments' after she was born were the jolie-pitts, not the holmes-cruises.
when you are dissing someone its good to get your facts straight first...