Seriously, if a woman who makes her money by marketing her image on the big screen can't expect to go topless out in the outdoors with her married (but separated) actor boyfriend without some kind of privacy, well, then what kind of world are we living in?
Photo Credit: Bauer Griffin Online
Website: www.bauergriffinonline.com































janepitt says:
Typical, this slut has no shame. She cavorts with a married man in public and now she claims that she has been violated. What about how she and Balthazar violated Rosetta Getty's peace of mind. This bitch needs to rot in hell.
Cat says:
I'm sooo with you about THIS BITCH to rot in HELL!!! I'll never see her movies or whatever this bitch promotes. All you men who wants to screw her, better get check out for herpes.
sissy says:
She is dating a good-looking guy on millionaire dating site (Millmatch....com). Seems she has a major crush on young good-looking guy!
angel says:
Yeah, Sienna, try to turn it around...like you haven't craved this attention for years! Rosetta should sue your skank ass!
Zekers says:
She nearly always looks so dirty/oily...you'd think it would be a fairly quick operation (to bathe) since she usually doesn't have and clothes on to begin with!
duda says:
how bout Rosetta Getty suing the skank for alienation of affection???
seriously... shes like a damn door knob.. everyones had a turn.
Zekers says:
Oops! "...doesn't have any"
say what? says:
how would she even have a case?
she was out in PUBLIC in most of those pictures (and standing at the window, and on her balcony, IN PLAIN SIGHT in others), so how is it an invasion of privacy?
This is as bad as Getty's statement basically blaming the photogs for causing his family pain and embarrassment instead of looking to HIMSELF.
well, (dirty) birds of a feather, and all that...
anonymous says:
She is unbelievable...Rosetta Getty was the one who has been hurt by all of this, but Sienna is going to try to play the victim card once again! Give me a break...this slag should burn for her actions!
LoveThatdoll says:
What a joke! The judge should throw the case out and tell her "Try to keep your clothes on and STOP going after married men!" She's such a SKANK, and he's a pig!
shammy says:
Sienna Miller is playing the VICTIM card and not accepting the fact that she is WRONG to have affairs with married men. Sienna needs some MAJOR help. Also, she better stop with the dirty chores as she is looking very haggardy and old lately. Not a pretty look Sienna. Ugly becomes what you make it on the inside and portrays to the beauty on the outside. Look in the mirror my lady.
roxierox says:
Wow. How dare this woman even think she has the right to sue. You were out in the freaking open, lady. This woman has NO SELF RESPECT...NONE, ZIP, ZERO! I can't imagine how embarrassing it was for Rosetta to see the pictures, but she should hold her head up because there aren't any topless photos of her for the ENTIRE world to see, plus no one's bashing her entegrity either.
roxierox says:
Wow. How dare this woman even think she has the right to sue. You were out in the freaking open, lady. This woman has NO SELF RESPECT...NONE, ZIP, ZERO! I can't imagine how embarrassing it was for Rosetta to see the pictures, but she should hold her head up because there aren't any topless photos of her for the ENTIRE world to see, plus no one's bashing her integrity either.
roxierox says:
Wow. How dare this woman even think she has the right to sue. You were out in the freaking open, lady. This woman has NO SELF RESPECT...NONE, ZIP, ZERO! I can't imagine how embarrassing it was for Rosetta to see the pictures, but she should hold her head up because there aren't any topless photos of her for the ENTIRE world to see, plus no one's bashing her character either.
meela says:
I love how everyone just puts everything off on Sienna. Balthazar Getty was there, too, and no one forced him to jump into her arms or leave his wife. I'm not saying I'm not bothered by her behavior, but seriously, people, it takes two. She's not the only one who is in the wrong here.